March 7, 2012
White Flag Project: Grace & Romans 6: The Apostle Paul Addresses Christians Who Love Sin

whiteflagxp:

What many Christians who love habitual sin like to say, if ever confronted about their sin:

Don’t judge me!

Get off your high-horse!

Don’t you understand grace?

I’m free in Christ, I can do what I want!

Jesus died for my sins, so my sins don’t matter. You sin too, you know!

What Paul…

(Source: whiteflagxp)

January 17, 2012
The Righteous Suffer Too

In recent months, the amount of suffering that the people in my life have experienced took a steep increase. They had lost loved ones, had suffered loss of their possessions, or had fallen seriously ill. Consequently, my prayers have been longer and more dedicated to them. I know that God works through these situations, but Christ himself had on a number of occasions taught his disciples to pray for what they wished according to the Father’s will.

I rejoice in knowing that the Christian communities I’d become a part of in the last couple of years hold a sound view of suffering and pain in light of the sovereignty of God. But, what has simultaneously pained and infuriated me in recent weeks is the grave realization that there are Christian churches that hold a very different and unbiblical view of suffering. I would go as far as to say that they are heretical.

According to this view, if a professing Christian suffers in any way it must be because he is in sin or is not truly saved. One may conclude then that tangible blessings and good health are the signs of salvation and right standing with God. If you were to challenge them to hold this view under the foundation of Scripture, they will fire at you Old Testament passages that have a particular interpretation of (1) words like “righteous” and “wicked” and (2) the idea of the righteous prospering and the wicked falling into ruin.

However, where this view falls apart are in both the New Testament teachings regarding trials and persecutions (Jesus himself promised that his followers would suffer persecution) and the clear and unmistakable example of the apostles’ lives. Of the apostles, Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 4:11-24, “To the present hour we hunger and thirst, we are poorly dressed and buffeted and homeless, and we labor, working with our own hands. When reviled, we bless; when persecuted, we endure; when slandered, we entreat. We have become, and are still, like the scum of the world, the refuse of all things”. This is regarding the apostles, who were filled with the Holy Spirit! The apostles suffered much persecution to the point where all but one apostle were martyred. Did they prosper during their time as servants to the Lord? The answer to that is clear. Rather, they endured all things, placing their hopes not on worldly pleasures but on the promise of heaven; that day when we will no longer suffer but will have everlasting joy with God.

You don’t even need the New Testament as a frame by which to understand the true meaning of the Old Testament. The point of the book of Job was not merely that bad things happen to “good” people. Job’s friends insisted that he suffered because he was in sin. But, Job responded, asking, “But how can a man be in the right before God?” (Job 9:2) The truth was that Job’s friends were not better than Job; they were all sinners in the eyes of God and the only reason they prospered was because of God’s unmerited, undeserved grace.

One of the big lessons in Job is that one cannot discern everything that God does and the reasons for them. Although Job’s friends argued that Job suffered because of sin, they themselves were not in the presence of God during his conversations with Satan in Job 1 and 2, where they could more easily discern the reason why Satan was allowed to bring suffering to Job. It was clear from those conversations that Job did not suffer because of sin. In Job 1:8, God says, “Have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil?” To conclude that professing Christians suffer because they are in sin is to indirectly admit that one does not understand the book of Job at all. Yes, Job was a sinner, but he was simultaneously righteous before God.

Naturally, one would ask, “then what is the righteous man?” If the righteous are not the morally perfect nor fully capable and successful in battling sin, then what are they? Psalm 32 is a good place to go:

“Blessed is the one whose transgression is forgiven,
whose sin is covered.
Blessed is the man against whom the LORD counts no iniquity,
and in whose spirit there is no deceit.

For when I kept silent, my bones wasted away
through my groaning all day long.
For day and night your hand was heavy upon me;
my strength was dried up as by the heat of summer.

I acknowledged my sin to you,
and I did not cover my iniquity;
I said, ‘I will confess my transgressions to the LORD,’
and you forgave the iniquity of my sin.”

Psalm 32:1-5

Job himself was a sinner. So, why was he called “blameless and upright”? He considered himself upright, but he also confessed that he was in need of mercy (Job 9:15). According to Psalm 32, the man who hides nothing from God but confesses his own sins before him is blessed because God forgives his iniquity (through Christ, of course). Even David himself confessed his sin, and God forgave. For this, he was considered righteous.

Abraham was called righteous because of his faith (Genesis 15:6) not because he was morally good. He lied to kings about his marriage to Sarah and he even laughed at God when God promised him a child. In 2 Peter 2:7, Lot was called “righteous”, but if you read Genesis’ account of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, Lot appeared as anything but righteous. He was timid and his faith was weak, even to the point where the angels had to drag him out of Sodom. Furthermore, after the destruction of these cities, his daughters got him drunk and slept with him in order to have offspring. Lot was nothing like the popular conception of a righteous man. Yet, he was called righteous, because he had faith (albeit small) in God and believed the angels who came to warn him (even though he lingered).

If one cannot be convinced at this point, one only has to look up the persecuted Church in the Middle East and parts of Africa and Asia. They suffer more than us comfortable American Christians, yet they are more faithful and zealous than us. To suggest that they are not true Christians because of persecution and their lack of material blessings (which seems typical of Middle Easter Christians) is nonsensical and ignores the blessing found in being persecuted (Acts 5:41).

Riches are not evil by nature; God uses riches for his glory (by having us give them to the needy). But, we can easily be blinded by riches from seeing that the only treasure worth pursuing is treasure in heaven. Riches on earth will not follow us in the afterlife. They will go to someone else (regardless if that someone is righteous or wicked <Job 21>)and will ultimately perish. We are called in invest on eternal things, things that truly matter.

December 28, 2011
I’ve never been more certain that “making a decision for Christ” at some point in the past is powerless if you’re not still making that decision today.

(Source: whiteflagxp)

December 27, 2011

(Source: whiteflagxp)

November 29, 2011
Happy Holidays in Secular America

It’s hard for me to express my thoughts on the political correctness issue of saying “Happy Holidays” rather than “Merry Christmas”. There are many factors that one must consider when thinking of this controversial topic. Among them, perhaps the two most important factors are (1) its place in the historical Church and (2) its nature in American society today.

Firstly, its understood that Christmas has its origins in the Roman Catholic Church as a celebration of the birth of Christ and marking the end of Advent. It is not recorded to have been celebrated by the early Church until the RCC was established. Arthur Pink, in his sermon against Christmas, pointed out that Jesus did not command Christians to remember his birth but rather that they remember his death. Perhaps this is an indication of why there was no Christmas celebration in the early Church.

After the Protestant Reformation, Puritans and other groups strongly opposed the celebration of Christmas, rejecting it as a Catholic tradition and a device of the pope. How strange that Martin Luther, one of the most important figures of the Reformation, celebrated Christmas himself and is said to have invented the idea of decorating Christmas trees to symbolize the light that shined from heaven which gazed upon Bethlehem where Christ would be born.

Despite its opposition by the Puritans, Christmas would slowly grow to become one of the biggest traditions in America. Unfortunately, it is mostly celebrated today with a spirit of greed and materialism rather than rejoicing for the coming of the Messiah. But, I guess to the credit of the Church, a glimpse of Christ still exists in this consumer-heavy America. Churches are trying to put Christ back into this historical tradition, and I greatly appreciate their efforts.

But, returning back to the consumerist aspect of this tradition, one must consider if it truly is politically incorrect to say “Merry Christmas” since non-Christians also celebrate Christmas in a sense by buying gifts, decorating with lights, and spending time with family and loved ones. The Christmas season marks the highest spending in America and many other nations, regardless of that nation’s religiosity. Merry Christmas is not an unfamiliar term in Japan, a nation where less than 2% of its population are Christians. When I was child growing up in both a Catholic church and Korean Presbyterian church, Santa Claus was a bigger representative image for Christmas than baby Jesus. Not much has changed as radio stations playing Christmas music almost entirely play secular Christmas songs. In light of all of this secularism, could it be so unacceptable for a person to say “Merry Christmas” rather than “Happy Holidays”? Should Muslims, Jews, and other religious people care? The Christians of post-Reformation times did not cease from celebrating Christmas even though they understood its (originally) pagan practices and Roman Catholic origins.

Christmas, to the American mind, is nothing more than a reason to break the bank for the sake of materialistic tradition (in keeping with America’s shallow religiosity). I imagine that the only ones who care about Advent and the birth of Christ are the Christians. The question of whether it really matters to say “Happy Holidays” or “Merry Christmas” should consider these things.

Despite all these thoughts, I’m of the opinion that this is a minuscule matter. It doesn’t upset me that people say “Happy Holidays”, but I would not be happy with being prohibited from saying “Merry Christmas”. Why this has risen to the level being a controversy is something I may never understand other than by concluding that we Americans get worked up about small issues.

November 23, 2011

(Source: jamiekcurtis, via heavenlyhelpedhippie-deactivate)

November 23, 2011
Reflections on “Only Your Blood is Enough”

Over the last week, “Only Your Blood is Enough” has been playing on my car, at home, and at work repeatedly. Previously, this song had never had such distinction over the other songs of Sojourn Music’s “Over the Grave” album. As far as style was concerned, it was not very different from many of the other songs. However, it wasn’t until I read the lyrics that I truly saw the beauty of the song (they’re posted on my previous blog post).

This song was derived from Isaac Watts’ rework of a part of Psalms 51, a psalm written by David some time after he committed adultery with Bathsheba. David confessed his sin before God, sought God’s mercy in both forgiving him and changing his heart to turn from his sinful ways. David also reflects upon the perfect justice and purity of God and the forgiveness He gives to those who are contrite and broken.

In his rewriting of this psalm, Watts endeavored to relate its message with New Testament Christians who did not immediately see the gospel in it. He wrote:

Jesus, my God, thy blood alone
Hath power sufficient to atone;
Thy blood can make me white as snow;
No Jewish types can cleanse me so.

From this psalm, Watts identified the sole hope of the Christian to be the work of Christ on the cross. Like David, he found no hope in his works. He confessed his own utter hopelessness in the flesh:

I am ashamed, conceived in sin, I’ve always been,
Born in a world where Adam’s fall corrupts us.
Rooted is the seed of death in life’s first breath.
The law demands a perfect heart, but I’m defiled in every part.

The psalmist acknowledged that his flesh was corrupted and sin was ever present in his life. Without Christ, he could only stand before God condemned.

All this guilt disturbs my peace; I find no release.
Who will save me from my crime? I’m helpless.
Behold, I fall before your face in need of grace.
So speak to me in a gentle voice, for in your mercies I rejoice.

Along with the hopelessness in his flesh came the absence of peace in his life. 

No bleeding bird, no bleeding beast,
No hyssop branch, no priest,
No running brook, no flood, no sea
Can wash away this stain from me.

He recognized that no ritual, no sacrifice, no human intercession could save him from his hopeless situation. He found hope in only one thing:

For only your blood is enough to cover my sins.
Only your blood is enough to cover me.

He sought God’s mercies in the cross and his power to save him from his dreading corruption.

Lord, create my heart anew (Father, come and make us wise)
Only you are pure and true (Lead us away from our demise)
Lord, you are the remedy (For only your blood can set us free) 

What is so distinctive about this song (and really any song that I take notice of) is how this song resonates with my life. My life as a Christian has, in part, been a process of losing more hope in myself yet placing more hope in Christ. 

When I was a younger Christian, I fell into the trap of thinking I could face my sin problem on my own. However, each day was met with a fresh realization of my inability and my failure to find victory over sin. I was being exposed to my sin everyday and sometimes to a higher degree than the last. As a result, my distress over my condition grew which would lead to times of doubting my own salvation. How forgetful I would often be of the grace and mercy of God that depends not on my performance or self-righteousness but on his love! But, God would lovingly remind me perhaps as often as I would forget that salvation is by grace alone and not based on my works. Eventually, I was beginning to set my hopes away from myself and on Christ. Slowly, prayer and Scripture reading became of higher priority and importance for me. I’m not sure if I’d call it being desperate for Christ, but I know for sure that God has placed me in a position of depending on him more than I had when I first believed.

There’s something very special about these two lines in the song:

The law demands a perfect heart, but I’m defiled in every part.

and

So speak to me in a gentle voice, for in your mercies I rejoice.

They’re the last lines of the two verses in the song. They’re followed up with the line “For only your blood is enough to cover my sin”.

Why should I be the recipient of such mercies? Truly, the law’s demands were far too great for even the best of mankind to be able to meet. In comparison to them, I’m but a worm. I could not say as the apostle Paul did, “If anyone else thinks he has reason for confidence in the flesh, I have more” (Philippians 3:4b). Nor could I say, as Martin Luther once did, that if salvation depended on works I would be first in line. Isaiah cried out when God revealed himself to him (Isaiah 6:5), I cannot imagine my own reaction if God were to reveal himself to me.

I can’t comprehend even half of the weight of my sin. He has every right to judge me harshly. Yet, before him I come pleading that he deal with me graciously. I know that I’m unworthy, but I also know my God to be merciful (Luke 15:17-20).

I come to the cross, because salvation is found there and only there. Nothing else will set me free but to trust in Christ and rest in his mercies.

This song is available on Youtube (http://youtu.be/RWnR9Z8PU5w).

November 18, 2011
Only Your Blood is Enough

I am ashamed, conceived in sin, I’ve always been.
Born in a world where Adam’s fall corrupts us.
Rooted is the seed of death in life’s first breath.
The law demands a perfect heart, but I’m defiled in every part

For only Your blood is enough to cover my sin
Only Your blood is enough to cover me

All this guilt disturbs my peace; I find no release.
Who will save me from my crime? I’m helpless.
Behold, I fall before Your face in need of grace.
So speak to me in a gentle voice, for in Your mercies I rejoice.

For only Your blood is enough to cover my sin
Only Your blood is enough to cover me

Lord, create my heart anew (Father, come and make us wise)
Only You are pure and true (Lead us away from our demise)
Lord, You are the remedy (For only your blood can set us free)

For only Your blood can set us free; only Your blood can set us free

No bleeding bird, no bleeding beast
No hyssop branch, no priest,
No running brook, no flood, no sea
Can wash away this stain from me

For only Your blood is enough to cover my sin

-Neil Robins, adapted from “Psalms 51 pt. 2” by Isaac Watts

November 16, 2011

Only Your Blood is Enough - Sojourn Music

November 8, 2011
"

O Blessed souls are they
Whose sins are cover’d o’er!
Divinely blest, to whom the Lord
Imputes their guilt no more!

They mourn their follies past,
And keep their hearts with care;
Their lips and lives, without deceit,
Shall prove their faith sincere.

While I conceal’d my guilt,
I felt the festering wound,
TillI confess’d my sins to thee,
And ready pardon found.

Let sinners learn to pray;
Let saints keep near the throne;
Our help, in times of deep distress,
Is found in God alone.

"

— Isaac Watts (Psalm based on Psalm 32)

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »